Newly Added Item 1/21/02 CAFO Manure Discharge Tests a 1,900 Times State Max E.Coli Limit, News from Michigan Sierra Club, December 27, 2001

"A Lenawee County woman's complaints against two dairy concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) for discharging manure wastes into county drains has yielded staggering levels of E.Coli bacteria contamination of the effected drains. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality laboratory tests obtained last week found samples of water downstream of one facility to contain 570,000 E.Coli colonies per 100 milliliters, or 1,900 times the state's maximum standard for E.Coli in surface waters."


Manure Storage Poses Invisible Risks, by Jeff Lorimor, extension engineer; Charles V. Schwab, extension safety specialist, and Laura Miller, extension communications, Iowa State University Extension, Ames, Iowa -- Fact Sheet Pm-1518k, a series of the Safe Farm Program, Iowa State University Extension

"Gases and odors may be a nuisance for many livestock producers, but they also can be a life-threatening danger when confined to buildings or manure pits."

Link to Original Article


Leaving This Site Calculating Manure and Manure Nutrient Application Rates, Brad C. Joern and Sarah L. Brichford, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University

Did you know that livestock excrete 70-80 percent of the nitrogen, 60-85 percent of the phosphorus, and 80-90 percent of the potassium fed to them? For example, if you feed 100 acres of corn to your livestock and collect all of the manure, there may be enough phosphorus and potassium to fertilize 75 acres (depending on your soil test phosphorus and potassium levels). Although the availability of manure nitrogen depends on several uncontrollable factors, the availability of manure phosphorus and potassium do not. Most of the fertilizer value of manure comes from phosphorus and potassium, not nitrogen. This bulletin will help you begin to manage manure as a crop nutrient resource, not a waste product.


Potential Health Effects of Odor From Animal Operations, Wastewater Treatment, and Recycling of Byproducts, by Susan S. Schiffman, PhD, Duke University, NC, John M. Walker, PhD, US EPA, Office of Water (sludge office), Pam Dalton, PhD, Tyler S. Lorig, PhD, James H. Raymer, PhD, Dennis Shusterman, MD, C. Mike Williams, PhD -- EXCERPTS

ABSTRACT. Complaints of health symptoms from ambient odors have become more frequent in communities with confined animal facilities, wastewater treatment plants, and biosolids recycling operations.

The most frequently reported health complaints include eye, nose, and throat irritation, headache, nausea, diarrhea, hoarseness, sore throat, cough, chest tightness, nasal congestion, palpitations, shortness of breath, stress, drowsiness, and alterations in mood.

Typically, these symptoms occur at the time of exposure and remit after a short period of time. However, for sensitive individuals such as asthmatic patients, exposure to odors may induce health symptoms that persist for longer periods of time as well as aggravate existing medical conditions.

A workshop was held at Duke University on April 16-17, 1998 cosponsored by Duke University, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) to assess the current state of knowledge regarding the health effects of ambient odors.

This report summarizes the conclusions from the Workshop regarding the potential mechanisms responsible for health symptoms from ambient odors. Methods for validation of health symptoms, presence of odor, and efficacy of odor management techniques are described as well.

Book Available from Haworth Press


Formation of Fuel-Grade Ethanol from Swine Waste via Gasification by B. Kaspers, J. Koger, R. Gould[1], A. Wossink[2], R. Edens[2], and T. van Kempen

Summary
The objective of this project is to investigate the application of gasification technologies to the treatment of swine waste for the ultimate production of fuel-grade ethanol. This waste treatment system would reduce the negative environmental impact of current manure management systems. The research objectives are: 1) to develop and test a system for harvesting swine manure in a form dry enough to be used as a gasification feedstock, 2) to establish the feasibility and the gasification conditions for the swine waste/amendments feedstock, 3) to characterize the end products of gasification (ethanol and mineral ash) and their potential markets, and 4) to conduct a rigorous economic analysis on the entire swine manure management model to determine its feasibility along with the factors that promote or impede its implementation.


For Big Hog Farms, Big Subsidies Taxpayers May Foot the Bill for Environmental Cleanup
Washington Post, August 17, 2001


Yard has moo-ved-in smell
Los Angeles Times, August 15, 2001


California dairy group hopes manure program breaks the bank
Environmental News Network, August 15, 2001


Senator Looks to Home With Bill on Manure Use
The New York Times, July 29, 2001


No blackouts for dairyman who converts manure to energy
American Farm Bureau News, June 25, 2001


The big stink. More milk means more manure — and a threat to a way of life.
Metro Times Detroit, July 3, 2001


Manure generated by concentrated livestock operations far exceeds capacity of nearby croplands
Ecological Society of America, Number 3, Summer 1998


Back to Main Index Page